12/7/2023 0 Comments Aj1 fragment toebox![]() ![]() Therefore, we always recommend looking at this label first, if possible. The interior side of the tongue is what we’ve always believed to be the best authenticity tells on the Nike Air Jordan 1s. Step summary: Fake shoes always have their text misplaced and at the wrong font-weight. Let’s now proceed to look at the full fake vs real comparison. Though, we’ve already given the short answer. You can tell if you’re holding a fake pair of Travis Scott Jordan 1 Low Reverse Mocha by checking the interior tongue labe, as fake pairs always have text at the wrong thickness. How to spot fake Travis Scott Jordan 1 Low Reverse Mocha This tutorial will teach you everything about legit checking these shoes. If you’re about to buy the Travis Scott Jordan 1 Low Reverse Mocha and don’t know whether you’re looking at a real or fake pair, there’s no need to worry anymore. If this is not the colourway that you’re looking to legit check, have a look at these guides for other colourways of the Travis Scott Jordan 1 Low: Dark Mocha Lows, Fragment Lows, Black Phantom Lows, Olive Lows. Travis Scott is back at it again with the iconic reverse-Swoosh Air Jordan 1s, and he’s added the Reverse Mochas to the line-up of Air Jordan 1 Low. This is a detail that’s never to be seen as flawed on the real Travis Scott Jordan 1s, as the text is always perfectly detailed on the real deal. Fake pairs always have their text at the wrong thickness. but none the less, just another data point you should consider when doing LCs.The most relevant detail to spot fake Travis Scott AJ1 Low Reverse Mocha is the interior tongue label. With all that said, that doesnt make the LJR fragment a bad rep, especially on foot, in fact, the fact that a consignment shop passed them is probably the bigger travesty here. Now with LJR being so close to current day retail, seeing the pic below, should ring alarm bells for anyone doing a legit check. ![]() Notice how much shorter the toe box panel is on the fragments when compared to a recent jordan 1 like the royal toes. Now this shape might make some LJR colorways like court purple MORE accurate, but it makes remastered jordans like royals, chicagos, fragments, SBB's less accurate.īut in watching a youtube i found a good depiction of the current retail shape (LJR shape as well) to retail fragments and retail royals LJR's toe box panel is wider and longer than retail of the same size, ignoring the difference in color that is present on a lot of LJR colorways. I generally use this picture from a review I did on LJR royals to shoe the shape difference in the toe box's of the LJR jordan 1s and a retail remastered Jordan 1. The issue with this is that Jordan 1's from the remasterd series (2014- late 2017/early 2018) did NOT share all of the same proportions as current jorodan 1s. LJR models all of their current jordans 1's after the current (non 85) Jordan 1 shape. One of the highlighted portions of the review showed that the shape of the toe box was idnetical to what i assume are retail court purple 2.0's And this was high lighted as good thing when in actuality makes the shoe inaccurate. I saw this morning that a recent post stating a pair of LJR Fragment 1s passed a Legit check at a consignment shop. The Left two shoes are LJR and Retail respectively. That said I decided add an actual retail rep example. ![]() The fragments are a size 11 while the royal toe are a size 13, which explains the DRASTIC difference in toe size. Edit: The owner of the frags ( u/shotbylace) used in the retail example actually reached out to me a pointed out there is a size discrepancy in in the retail pairs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |